Jump to content

Kerry Parr

Members
  • Content count

    208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Kerry Parr last won the day on January 20

Kerry Parr had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

71 Excellent

3 Followers

About Kerry Parr

  • Rank
    Active Muse

Contact Methods

  • Facebook
    https://m.facebook.com/Attic-Salt
  • YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/kerryparr

Previous Fields

  • Lyricist, Composer or Both?
    Both
  • Musical Influences?
    Dylan, Cohen, Cave, Oberst, Dulli, Cobain, Phillips (Grant Lee and John), too many to list really.
  1. March Lyrics Contest

    I haven't had time to properly reply to anything until now but things I want to respond to are growing so exponentially, I'm gonna have to just start bailing some water. First, a long belated congrats to the winners! Patty's was my top pick, Donna's was undervalued in my scoring, and Clemo's was criminally undervalued in the final ranking. I tend to read through lyrics like an A&R rep at Sony would listen to a demo... if nothing grabs my attention in the first few seconds, I hit eject. This is at the expense of missing a few hidden gems, granted, but it's a numbers game. This is how "The Rain" originally missed me. By title alone I'd think, "Oh gawd, another song about the rain" (great song by Cracker btw https://youtu.be/R8zuQH27Qjk) let alone the style of speaking came across as less than natural and more proper and gilded, which I think might be part of what Barney is getting at. Nothing new or exciting jumped out at me at the time, and though it's still a bit quaint and anodyne for my particular tastes, I appreciate the subtler things I originally missed. Patty's jumped out at me more and though she'd likely be loath to admit, it shares a commonality with mine. They both speak to a taboo truth of our inmost ugly thoughts, her's with earnest solemnity and mine with insecure and boorish bluster, but things we don't like to admit about ourselves nonetheless. I'll diverge here a bit since I brought up my own song to say thank you to those who liked it originally as well as those who hated it. Admittedly, I was intentionally pissing in the wind by entering it in the first place, caused by my own concern about the style of many of the other entries and winners by making a passive-aggressive point. It might be a record to have over a 3rd of the judges give you the lowest possible score, especially when people's default setting is to not hurt or offend that you can safely assume that any of the 4's and 4.5's were "being nice" so to speak. I doubt the low scores had much to do with the intentionally trite lines like "you're the only girl I'll ever love/dreaming of" but had more to do with its crass vulgarity. Even if it got your disdain, it captured your attention and that's a win right there ("I can't deny the fact that you hate me, you really hate me!." ). The recording that followed (And thanks too, for those who liked the music version) can also illustrate what doesn't seem to work on paper can work better than what does, and to make us ask ourselves how to bridge that gap. Generally speaking, I notice far too many retreads of the same old themes and no new twists or play on words. There's a dearth of powerful, attention grabbing opening lines and the choruses are often just as anemic if not overly long, meandering, and indistinguishable from the verses and just as unmemorable. A lot of them are just overly long, at least on page, that with a couple dozen entries tend to all blur into one. I've never entered my favorites... only the shortest, simplest, and succinct to break the monotony. As far as "winning formulas" in these contests go, I've had various theories dispelled so I'm not sure. My first theory when I joined was themes about veterans or getting into heaven played overly well on judges sentiments. I had started writing a song called "I Put the Wrong Song in the Song Contest", poking fun of the various winning memes that was to be my first entry but never finished it because I didn't want to start off by being an asshole. In the meantime, there have been what I consider fair judgments as well as frustrating ones. An interesting one to me was, "Bar Room Rodeo" a month or two back. It kind of bucked the trend in that it was just a fun party song. No deep or sentimental themes (superficial and well-worn, honestly), no poetic language to really speak of that I can recall but it was something that most everyone could hear in their head as a finished song they (or at least Country fans) would enjoy. Barney can thank the millions of undocumented immigrants voting for that one And ah yes, Barney... I haven't had a good blood sacrifice in awhile but I'd likely take it too far. He only "thinks" he's a fan straight-forward, unbridled truths - but it's society's sympathetic soft-peddling that keep people like him from being the most crushed underfoot.
  2. March Lyrics Contest

    https://vlipsy.com/vlip/south-park-just-get-it-man-o3OM0ZOS
  3. March Lyrics Contest

    I'm biting my tongue with jaw dropped to the floor.
  4. March Lyrics Contest

    @Moso I'm actually truly delighted I would've been bothered had it been some middling ranking. The remarkable thing is how exceedingly popular it is among the crowds I play it to and how women, in particular, love to sing along with it. Maybe, it's the sophisticated musicality??? https://m.soundcloud.com/kerry-parr/facial
  5. Condemned to the Blues

    Losing "condemned" loses the entire metaphor. Don't do it.
  6. Condemned to the Blues

    I think there's some other metaphors you could add like "now I'm banging on the bars", "you're rattling my cage", or "I'm held in contempt for decisions you made"
  7. Just In

    I wasn't so much suggesting that as much as the possibility you edited before I responded and I only saw the first draft. More likely I just missed it since I had just woken from a nap. Trump's politics and persona is such an outlier from normalcy that I doubt it's much of a litmus test in any usual left v right sense.
  8. Condemned to the Blues

    Actually, v1 and v2 are pretty strong. Not a fan of the chorus except for the last couple of lines or "the tag". Not find of the bridge but I'd probably use "objections" vs "plea" if you keep it. I think it's got potential if you rework some of those things.
  9. Just In

    First off, I missed a couple of nuances and qualifiers in your previous reply. I wonder if you edited or if I simply didn't see the gorilla. Anyway, I would have crafted my response slightly differently had I seen them. Again though, this has nothing to do with CNN in particular. This was a hypothetical thought experiment where CNN can be interchanged with any real or fictional news source. The question is how to determine a reasonably objective center. Going by your method, no matter how extreme any political position gets, the center would have to simultaneously shift proportionally in that direction. I hate to invoke Godwin's Law but were it Nazi Germany, the centrist may not approve of the Holocaust but they'd still be pulled into an antisemitic position. Skepticism is healthy to a point- but the active distrust I sense from you (if not you, certainly many others), where you seem to trust only that they're wrong and duplicitous, isn't. It can lead you into believing the sky is plaid just because they said it's blue.
  10. Just In

    If you read carefully, I wasn't defending CNN but rather questioning your awful heuristic. You followed up with more. Would you rather that didn't retract information or stories the way Breibart doesn't? Oh, and Trump solved North Korea? The talks to South Korea couldn't have had anything to do with the Olympics or other reasons? Do I think Trump had an effect? Maybe... but to say with such assurance is absurd. And the fact you think anyone ignored positive economic gains is patently false. Maybe you need a retraction section.
  11. Just In

    This, in itself, concludes nothing. It could just as likely be true that Trump is an objectively bad president. I'd also be curious how they "analyzed" the news to be negative. If, for example, CNN gives time to the newsworthy Mueller investigation, is that negative in and of itself? Must they need to air a Trump fluff piece of equal time just to appear unbiased to you?
  12. A Thousand Years Ago

    He was a "dumb kid" when he left her, well before his divorce.
  13. A Thousand Years Ago

    Sorry, I don't like it. I know it's said the art of writing is in the rewriting but I often find it the opposite... that it just kills the instict and becomes overthought, forced and dry. The original is good as is.
  14. A Thousand Years Ago

    You've got some really good lines here These are my favorites There's nothing I'd really suggest. I mean, you could fill it with a bit more story or resolution if you wanted (and only if you happen to have more quality lines up your sleeve) but I don't think it's necessary. I really like it. Thanks
  15. Racist

    Yeah, this problem is ultimately more concerning to me than people bullshitting about their true motives.
×